By Karen A. Feste (auth.)
Read or Download America Responds to Terrorism: Conflict Resolution Strategies of Clinton, Bush, and Obama PDF
Similar terrorism books
A big volume of media area has been dedicated to the catastrophic terrorist assaults in ny and Washington. George Bush used to be quickly to claim a 'war on terrorism' which may engulf many nations as well as Afghanistan. yet what does this say approximately Western perceptions of violence -- what does 'war on terrorism' suggest?
This scholarly learn of the lingering results of the 1995 Oklahoma urban Bombing places into viewpoint the psychic damage performed to the numerous affected. It seems on the manner grief performed out in deepest and public spheres, and considers the Oklahoma urban nationwide Memorial as an important contribution which can let us know much approximately anguish and comfort.
November 22, 1963 chronicles the day of John F. Kennedy's assassination. It starts off that morning, with Jackie Kennedy in a fortress worthy lodge, approximately to go away for Dallas. Her aircraft journey out of Dallas after the assassination varieties the connecting arc for the e-book, which ends up with Mrs. Kennedy’s go back to the White condo at four a.
The CRC Press Terrorism Reader assembles the perception of an unmatched pool of writer specialists to supply the last word finished source on terrorism. With details drawn from most appropriate titles within the CRC Press assortment, the publication starts off via discussing the origins and definitions of terrorism in addition to its motivations and psychology.
Additional resources for America Responds to Terrorism: Conflict Resolution Strategies of Clinton, Bush, and Obama
The perception that the invasion was a Soviet ploy to test American resolve switched the reference point to one defining the matter as a grave threat to the national interest. Failure to resist the Soviet-inspired aggression could result in additional Soviet challenges of a more severe and frequent nature, up to a general war. Resistance to this aggression could lead to uncontrolled escalation, but even if it did not, it would certainly result in numerous American casualties. The framing of the problem led policymakers to believe that they were serving the best interest of the United States by intervening.
Conflict arises by opposing self-interests of parties. Thus achieving a balance of power is the best one can do, which means expanding and preserving one’s power. Liberals believe humans are capable of enlightened cooperation and interdependence; they operate with an optimistic view of the world. Conflict arises because no central process can effectively regulate competition. Thus, it is important to cooperate in order to achieve mutual interests. Constructivists have no real assumptions about human nature; they focus on ideas and communications as key to politics (Rourke, 2007).
Framing is a way to make certain aspects of the perceived reality more or less salient, which, in turn, lead to certain interpretations and conclusions of the text. It induces a particular kind of understanding of events. Framing serves a as a context cue to shortcut literal descriptions of what kinds of knowledge a speaker wishes to activate in their audiences. There is no shortage of framing applications of political leaders. Chapter Two Presidential Frames of Terrorism Decision makers form conscious or unconscious framing judgments in deciding what to say.
America Responds to Terrorism: Conflict Resolution Strategies of Clinton, Bush, and Obama by Karen A. Feste (auth.)